The
Republican presidential race took a great leap on Tuesday when my home state of
Georgia, along with nine others, all held primaries or caucuses on the same
day. Against my better judgment, I
stayed up to around 3:30 to watch the returns come in. Georgia was declared a win for Newt Gingrich
within minutes of the polls closing at 2:00 a.m. Helsinki time. No surprise there. Not even Newt could manage to lose in his
home state.
Gingrich
got 47% of the vote in Georgia, to Romney’s 26%. What surprises me is that Santorum, favorite
of hard-core evangelical Christians was only able to reach 20%. Ron Paul got a pitiful 6%, which I guess
shows there really isn’t much of a libertarian streak in the Peach State after
all. Republicans in my home county in
North Georgia went for the native son in an even bigger way. They cast 51% of their votes for Gingrich,
giving him a whopping 28 points lead over Romney. And this despite support for Romney from some
of the county’s more prominent citizens that was enthusiastic enough to draw
attention from national TV, though not exactly in a good way.
While
Gingrich took Georgia by storm, you have to wonder whether the hurricane force
of his personality (read, “blow-hard”) is strong enough to carry him much
beyond his home state. It begins to look
like he doesn’t have much of a natural base outside his native south, if even
there. In northern and western Super
Tuesday states, like Massachusetts and Idaho, Gingrich didn’t make it higher
than 8%. In Ohio, he did better (15%),
but still came in third.
Even
in the South, Gingrich wasn’t a shoo-in.
Neighboring Tennessee, just up I-75 from Atlanta, went overwhelmingly
for Santorum, leaving Gingrich in distant third place. With a less-than-stellar showing like that,
it’s no wonder there’s lots of talk that Gingrich should do everyone a favor
and quit. Of course, he won’t. Not yet.
He’s betting that Georgia and South Carolina weren’t just flukes and is putting
all his chips on Alabama and Mississippi, two other Deep South states that vote
next Tuesday.
I
have a feeling that the baffling allure of Newt Gingrich does not extend much
beyond the Georgia state line, and he’ll lose next week, especially when
God-fearing voters in Alabama and Mississippi have the option of Rick
Santorum.
If
you ask me, Santorum’s allure is just as baffling as Gingrich’s. He is not only conservative, but also a true
believer. He’s a deeply religious Catholic
with an antiquated worldview that has apparently prompted him reopen a debate
that many of us thought was settled over 50 years ago.
Everyone
recognizes that abortion is an incredibly emotional and tangled issue, and one
that is still controversial for many Americans.
I don’t doubt for a moment that Santorum, like many conservatives, would
like to see abortion disappear. But what
is surprising is that he also seems to feel the same way about birth control, decades
after the Pill made planned pregnancies easier and a way of life for most
Americans.
Maybe
that’s what bothers Santorum. He is currently
riding the wave of controversy over birth control that would have been hard to
predict a year ago. He has talked about “the
dangers of contraception” in America, which he sees as not only unleashing sexual
freedom outside of marriage, but also igniting too much sexual pleasure within it. In Santorum’s mind, sex between a husband and
wife is sullied by contraception.
Without the possibility of creating a baby each and every time, matrimonial
sex is diminished, reduced to just an act of pleasure stripped of its true
purpose, procreation.
I’ll
hazard a guess that most married couples in America kind of like it like that. In ordinary times, I would say that Santorum
is way out of step with his fellow citizens.
But these may not be ordinary times.
Just witness the uproar surrounding Sandra Fluke.
Fluke,
a 30-year-old law student, tried to testify before Congress in favor of forcing
church-supported universities, such as Fluke’s Georgetown, to pay for birth
control as part of their health-care insurance coverage. (It was a White House proposal along these
lines that first awoke the apparently long-simmering animosity of conservative
Republicans to birth control.)
Fluke
told an informal panel of Democratic lawmakers that the lack of insurance
coverage for birth control pills could cause hardship for low-income students
at Georgetown. She explained how a
fellow student with an ovary condition treatable with birth control pills
eventually lost an ovary after she was unable to get the medication through Georgetown
University’s insurance.
Now,
some conservatives might simply argue against the policy Fluke was
advocating. (By the way, the public
health system in Finland pays when women visit a clinic for birth control prescriptions,
but not for the medication itself. Women
here have to cover the cost of the pills, unless they need them for a medical
condition.) Or conservative critics
might question Fluke’s objectivity or accuse her of exaggerating the severity
of the issue. Fair points. But that wouldn’t have been vicious enough
for conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh, a gasbag of historic
proportions.
On
his nationally broadcast show, Rush launched into a personal attack against
Fluke where he called her a “slut” and “prostitute” for expecting taxpayers to
pay her to have sex. Rush’s twisted (in
every sense) logic was that Fluke was having so much sex that she could no
longer afford to pay for birth control herself.
He continued his on-air attacks for four days in a row, at one point
suggesting that if taxpayers had to pay for Fluke to have consequence-free sex,
then she should provide video tapes of the encounters so everyone could enjoy.
Even
by Rush Limbaugh standards, this is simply unbelievable. Not to mention totally inaccurate. Besides being incredibly insulting and juvenile, his rant bore no relation to what Fluke’s actually
said, to the issue at large, or the reality of birth control itself. For example, it would be private insurance
paying for the pills, not taxpayers.
Limbaugh also seems to think a woman needs to take a birth control pill
each time she has sex. Chances are he’s
confusing birth control medication with Viagra, something he apparently does
know quite a bit about.
Limbaugh
finally issued a lukewarm apology when sponsors started leaving his show, but
hasn’t faced much real criticism from the right over his comments, least of all
from the GOP presidential candidates, who all seem afraid of him. I would love to think that something like
this would force him off the air for good, but the way things are these days, I
wouldn’t get too hopeful.
Happy
International Women’s Day?
Politics in the USA is embarrassing. To me, at least. If I ever do get to go abroad, I hope no one asks me to explain our weird, racist, phobia-ridden culture.
ReplyDeleteI saw the piece on Comedy Central about the Romney fans in Ellijay. The only person I recognized was Oscar Poole. He's a really rabid Republican, which kind of surprised me when I discovered that. I reckon he kept his radical views in check when he was minister so as not to seem to be in opposition to any of his congregation. I kind of liked the guy way back when. (I don't know how his son, Greg, ended up, or where. I emailed Oscar Poole once to ask him, but he never responded.)
As always, your blog is interesting and well composed.
Thanks, Bob. Nice to hear. I think the US political system is even harder to explain this time around. It really seems things are going backwards.
ReplyDelete