I don’t normally note Veteran’s Day, since I’m a
liberal, and liberals tend not to valorize the military the way conservatives
do. And by “valorize”, I mean the kind of conspicuous virtue signaling of
patriotism that American conservatives love to plaster across their social
media. Flags, eagles, that sort of stuff.
However, to make a blatant political point, I thought it might be
interesting to talk about the veterans who are currently running for president.
What makes this especially relevant is the recent publication of a book by
Donald Trump’s son Junior, titled “Triggered: How the Left Thrives on Hate and
Wants to Silence Us”. (The very long subtitle kinda gives away the plot,
doesn’t it?)
In this book, out just in time for Veteran’s Day, Don Jr.
recalls visiting Arlington Cemetery just before his father’s inauguration and
how the rows and rows of graves of fallen soldiers movingly reminded him of all
the business opportunities his family was sacrificing by coming to Washington,
all the revenue they have foregone for the country. Call it “bottom-line
valor”. Crass and tone deaf doesn’t even begin to describe it.
You would
think a political family with no history of military service whatsoever would
shy away from making those kinds of comparisons. Donald Trump famously avoided
the Vietnam War thanks to student deferments and a bogus “bone spur”. What’s
more, neither of his sons have served in the military. That’s not surprising,
of course. The only prep-school scions of the American elite who join the
military are those who really want to
(I’m thinking here of John Kerry, Robert Mueller, etc.), as opposed to
lower-class folks who have fewer economic options.
So, I wondered how do
the other candidates stack up?
Let’s start with the Republicans. And, yes,
there are some besides Trump, namely Mark
Sanford, Joe Walsh, and Bill Weld. The first two were born in
the early 60s, and thus too old for any major war event that you might expect
would inspire people to join up, like Pat Tillman did. Tillman was the NFL
player who retired at the height of his pro ball career to join the Army in
response to 9-11. He died in Afghanistan in 2004. He was basically the same age
as Don Jr. Hmmm.
Back to the candidates. Bill Weld was born in 1945, a year
before Trump, so he, like Trump, was of a prime age to fight for his country.
He did not. Just like Trump.
On the Democratic side, there are currently 16
candidates. No, 17. I know, it’s hard to keep track. Five are women. I hope
it’s not sexist to say women aren’t normally expected to serve in the military,
so no one would look askance at Elizabeth Warren not having military
credentials to flout.
The punitive frontrunner Joe Biden, born in 1942 which makes him a bit older than Trump, was
in his mid 20s at the height of the Vietnam War. He stayed out of the war with
the help of deferments and a history of asthma. His son Beau joined the
National Guard as a JAG officer in 2002 at the age of 33. Obviously, that’s
serving part-time in the military, though he did serve one year in Iraq. He
remained in the Guard until his untimely death in 2014. Younger brother Hunter
also joined the service, the US Navy Reserve in the case, somewhat late at the
age of 43 (it’s not too late for the Trump boys!), but was discharged after
only a year after testing positive for cocaine. Hunter, it seems, is turning
out to be a problematic child.
That leaves 11 other male candidates. Bernie Sanders, even older than Biden,
could have served in Vietnam if he’d really wanted, though no one would expect
a young leftist political activist who took part in anti-war protests at the
time to volunteer to go kill Viet Cong. In fact, Sanders applied for
conscientious objector status, which was ultimately rejected, though by that
time he was too old to be drafted anyway.
Tom Steyer is about my own age, too young for Vietnam, too old for
the next war. Not that you have to wait
for a war. Joe Sestak, who I admit
was not on my radar at all, went straight from High School to the Naval
Academy, following the example of his father. He graduated as an ensign in
1974, just after the Paris Peace Accords ended the US involvement in Vietnam.
Sestak spent 31 years in the Navy, rising to the rank of Vice Admiral and
commanded an aircraft carrier battle group operating in Persian Gulf during the
Iraq War.
John Delaney, Michael Bennet, Steve Bullock, and Cory
Booker were all children of the 60s. That put them well into their 30s
during the Iraq War and borderline “too old” even for the Gulf War a decade
earlier. On the other hand, Booker was only 22 when Norman Schwarzkopf led the
liberation of Kuwait in 1991, though the whole thing was over so quickly,
Booker would not likely have seen combat even if he had rushed to join up.
Julian Castro, Wayne Messam, and Andrew
Yang were almost 30 when George W. Bush launched his unnecessary and cursed
invasion of Iraq in 2003. Again, a bit too old to take part in any case.
Pete Buttigieg, the youngest candidate,
joined the US Navy Reserve at the age of 27, retiring as a lieutenant after
eight years. I guess Reservists, like National Guardsmen, are mostly “weekend
warriors”, and for his monthly stints of duty Buttigieg was assigned to a post
on Lake Michigan, within driving distance of South Bend, Indiana, where part of
that time he was mayor. He did take a break from running South Bend to ship
overseas to Afghanistan for a six-month tour as a naval intelligence office and
armed driver for his CO.
Another Democratic candidate, Tulsi Gabbard, is the only female vet running for the White House,
maybe the only one who ever has. She joined the National Guard just weeks after
the opening “shock and awe” of the American hostilities against Iraq. She
continues to serve, currently with the rank of major. She served a year-long
tour in Iraq in a medical support unit and a second tour in Kuwait in an MP
(Military Police) unit. I’ll leave the question as to whether she’s a Russian asset
to another time.
So, for folks keeping score...
The current president
and his three GOP challengers: Zero
military service, though when two of them where of draft age there was a
rather hot war going on.
The 17 Democratic candidates: Of the 12 men
running, seven came of age between the Vietnam and Iraq wars, during a time of relative peace. Of the remaining five men, two did serve, one as a career Navy
man. Of the five women candidates, one is currently still serving in the
military. That’s a total of three vets.
It’s a good thing Republicans don’t look for military experience in their
leaders. Otherwise, they’d have to switch parties. Or maybe that would be a
good thing.