The
World Economic Forum issued its annual “Global Gender Gap Report”, with the
unsurprising result that Finland remains one of the most progressive countries
in gender equality anywhere in the world. This year, Finland moved up one spot
from number three to be outdone only by Iceland. Ever consistent, Suomi has
seesawed over the past six years between either number two or three in this list of some 130 nations. The US dropped to 22nd place, between Canada
and Mozambique, from 17th last year.
The
ranking is based on measurements of gender equality in four categories related
to health, education, employment and politics. And it’s good to keep in mind
that the differences between a country and those ranking just above or below it
are mostly very small. The big gap comes, as always, between the top and bottom
of the list.
Considering
the quality of health care and education here, it's no news flash that Finland is
ranked number one in both “Educational Attainment” and “Health and Survival”.
What
is even more encouraging is that Finland is not alone in achieving near-total gender
equality in these two essential elements for a successful life.
Thirty-one
other nations (countries as diverse as France, Uganda and Mexico) tied with
Finland for the top spot in comparative health outcomes for men and women (score 0.9796). Unfortunately, the US
did not quite make it into this group. It was relegated to the next-best ranking
(with a very close score of 0.9792). The difference seems to be that in Finland, women outlive
men by one year more than they do in America.
In education, 19 other countries, including the US, joined Finland in gaining the highest possible
score (1.0000, which represents perfect equality). Before getting
too heady about the appearance of progress in this area, however, we shouldn’t forget
Malala Yousafzai.
With
so many countries (almost a quarter of those surveyed) seeming to agree on the
importance of educating women, it’s all the more glaring to realize how this
basic right can incite raw hatred in some parts of the world. (Swat Valley, I’m
talking about you – but you’re probably not alone.) Just imagine the kind of primitive,
dark mind someone must possess in order to justify shooting a fifteen-year-old
girl in the head for simply helping to ensure other girls can attend
school. Girls in school! What a subversive concept! The fabric of society will
be torn apart! Thankfully, such a medieval mindset isn’t shared by the rest of
the world, and thankfully Malala survived the attack, as horrific as it was.
Back to the WEF report. The
category where the difference between Finland and the US is the widest, big
enough in fact to drive a presidential campaign bus through, is “Political
Empowerment”. In this category, which is based mainly on the ratio of women in a nation's political leadership, Finland came in second (score 0.6162), while
America placed a very distant 55th (score 0.1557), between Israel
and Madagascar.
This
poor result for America shouldn’t be shocking. Of the 535 current senators and
members of Congress only 92 are women (in Finland it’s almost half), and no
woman has ever attained the US presidency. If a county has had at least one
female head of state, you can tell your daughter that someday she can be president,
without sounding divorced from reality. That’s much harder to do in the US.
The
only category where the US outperforms Finland is “Economic Participation and
Opportunity” (a fancy way of saying “working outside the home”), where it ranked
8th compared to Finland's 14th place. (Mongolia is top of the world in
this category – certainly a thing to ponder.)
Finland’s weak spot here seems to be the relative dearth of female managers (score of 0.42
compared to America’s 0.74). This is based on a reported 43% of American bosses
being women, whereas in Finland the share of managers who can boast of two
X-chromosomes is a mere 30%.
I
guess I have to take the WEF at its word on this, though my impressions are
different, skewed perhaps by my own experience of the Finnish workplace.
In
my twenty-plus years of working in Finland, I’ve had a dozen bosses, of which seven
have been women. That’s well above 30%, though I can easily believe my work
history isn’t typical. In the high-tech electronics firms where I made my
living, the documentation, marketing and PR teams I worked in tended to attract
the more, uh, expressive sex (there,
I said it). Especially in a work environment dominated by no-nonsense mostly
male engineers, more gender equality is always more than welcome.
There's also another side to this. Men show more variance than women by just about any metric. (It makes evolutionary sense for the ones getting pregnant to be the stable base and the risk-takers take also the genetic risks.) While men men the seats on the top, they are also the ones in the gutter. It also means that, achieving "equality" with as many men as women on the top quite likely also means favouring the majority of women over the majority of men.
ReplyDelete