One
of the notions that is drilled into the head of every American practically from
birth is that the United States, of all the countries on Planet Earth, is
uniquely “exceptional”.
This
is such as a firmly anchored article of faith that to question it in the least
is to risk almost branding yourself as anti-American.
During
Barack Obama’s presidential campaign, (I forget which one, since he won twice),
one of the many accusations that his opponents hurled at him was that he didn’t
believe in “American exceptionalism”. This is a serious charge.
American
exceptionalism ranks right up there with a belief in God when it comes to the
standard litany of heart-felt convictions that all American politicians must
profess, loudly and often, if they hope to attain any office higher than that
of dogcatcher.
As
you might guess, I don’t completely buy into American exceptionalism, at least
in the sense that many conservatives like to think of it. But I do agree that the
US is exceptional in other ways that Americans should be proud of. One is its
multicultural society. Another is its National Park System.
Now,
the fact that the US is blessed with an unusual abundance of natural spots of
amazing scenic beauty is something no national leader can take credit for. It’s
just a lucky feature of the North American landscape.
Yellowstone
and the Grand Canyon were spectacular long before any forefather, who might
have been inclined to bring forth a new nation on any continent, ever set foot in
the New World. And these places will remain spectacular long after the last
vestige of the “United States” has faded away.
It’s
not just that the US has an outstanding wealth of natural wonders, or even that
it’s the only country so blessed (I’m thinking of places like Switzerland and
New Zealand here). What really makes America exceptional is how, thanks to
visionary men like John Muir and Teddy Roosevelt, the nation decided to protect
these wonders, making open to the public immense swaths of the best scenery America
has to offer.
I’m
grateful and proud that the US has a National Park System that, in many ways, has
set the gold standard for safekeeping natural treasures.
Growing
up in North Georgia as I did, a natural treasure that we often gravitated to was the
chunk of wilderness that makes up the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. As a
teenager, my buddies and I spent many days exploring some of the more remote
corners of the Smokies on extended hiking trips that I still remember fondly.
Over
the years, National Parks have often played a big part of our family vacations from Finland.
We’ve taken our kids to various parks whenever we’ve traveled somewhere in the
States. This past summer, we briefly visited Mojave National Preserve in
California, Dinosaur National Monument in Utah, and the Grand Canyon National
Park in Arizona (my third time there).
We
are not unique in that regard. Every year, there are some 280 million visits to
some part of the National Park System, and this out of a nation of 314 million
Americans, plus of course foreign tourists who flock to sites as varied, and
iconic, as the Grand Tetons and the Statue of Liberty.
It’s
little wonder then that, for many average Americans, the national parks are a
very visible and familiar part of the federal government, the federal
government that many of those same average Americans seem to otherwise detest
and think they could live much better without.
 |
| On the Bright Angel Trail, Grand Canyon National Park, 2013. |
When
the federal government partially shut down on October 1st, thanks to some
unwise negotiating tactics by Tea Party Republicans, one of the most immediate
and visible impacts was the closing of all national parks, sadly bringing places
set aside for nature and recreation to the front and center of a nasty political
debate.
Some
conservative pundits and politicians, openly giddy over the prospect of a
federal shutdown, tried their best to downplay any negative fallout from the
sudden disappearance of most government services (98 percent of NASA, for
example). “What? The sky didn’t fall?”
But,
the closing of the parks hit a nerve and has the real potential of reminding
voters that there’s one part of the national government that they actually
appreciate.
You
would think that the disruption, or even ruin, of family vacations by the
closure of parks would be enough to spark a backlash against those Republican politicians who,
out of pique, so cavalierly caused this mess.
And
maybe in some ways that’s the case. But in the eyes of some people, it has also
somehow made the Park Service out to be the bad guy, the face of an arrogant
and manipulative government.
Media
images of WWII veterans being denied access to war memorials in Washington has
been exploited by conservatives to fuel criticism of the Park Service and led
to civil disobedience by conservative on the Mall this past weekend, presided
over by the oh-so-ardent Tea Party celebrity Sarah Palin and Ted Cruz, the
shadow leader of the GOP.
The
closure of open-air monuments that don’t require entrance fees seems a bit over
the top, even to me. It would be like the Finnish government putting barricades
around the Sibelius monument (standing alone in a city park) due to austerity
measures. Unless there are some arcade legal reasons behind such closures of
open spaces that I’m not aware of, it doesn’t really make sense and plays into the
hands of Republicans who are all too happy for any excuse to vilify Washington.
Despite
the opportunities for schmaltzy photo ops within walking distance of the Capitol, the
Republicans soon realized how closing popular parks can come back to bite them.
Early into the shutdown, the GOP-dominated House scrabbled to partly backpedal by
passing resolutions to fund only the Park Service (along with a few other shiny
objects that gained media attention, like cancer treatment trials for children).
 |
| Magnificent view of Yosemite Valley. Photo by Eeek. |
The
Senate wisely didn’t go along with the piece-meal approach to governing, so the
parks remained closed.
Except,
not entirely. Some parks have now reopened after five states, desperate to stem
the loss of tourist dollars, agreed to provide the money to keep marquee parks
operating. Arizona, the Grand Canyon State, has agreed to fork over state money,
to the tune of $93,000 a day, to keep part of the Grand Canyon National Park
open for a week. Utah is transferring $1.67 million to the US Treasury to
reopen five parks in that state for ten days.
What
is interesting is that these states, bastions of the Republican Party, are two
of the 28 or so that typically receive more money from the national government
than they pay in federal taxes. Or, to put it in the parlance of Ayn Rand, these
are “moocher states”.
I
hope that having to pay out of their own pocket for services normally funded by
the taxpayers of more liberal states like California and New York provides an
object lesson to the good people of Arizona:
sometimes it’s beneficial to be part of a larger union of diverse states.
I
dearly hope Arizona and Utah are not reimbursed, so as to drive that lesson
home.
However,
some people may be taking away a different lesson. I’ve seen some Internet
chatter from folks who, miffed at how shutting down the hated federal government
has also shut down beloved parks, have jumped to the conclusion that maybe
it’s time to devolve the national parks to the individual states and let them run
places like Yosemite and Yellowstone.
On
National Public Radio recently there was even someone from the libertarian Cato Institute
suggesting that the national parks, to me a true treasure of public heritage,
should all be privatized.
I
hope all Americans would agree that this would be a bad idea, an exceptionally
bad idea. ¶
